Monday, July 12, 2010

Finding a Container for Love

Irisha, one of the bloggers at the group blog, An Appropriate Response, recently wrote an entry regarding dharma in relationships, inspired by a Buddhist Geeks podcast.

I haven’t listened to the podcast yet, between Buddhist Geeks and Lama Marut (if you haven’t checked out his podcasts- do so- my runs fly by because my heart is kept so light listening to him) I have quite the backlog. But it is there, and soon I will listen.

She writes about authenticity with her partner, about dropping expectations and fear of loss and simply dealing with what is at hand in the relationship.

Which is a beautiful thing to do inside the container of a loving relationship.

But what happens when there is no container? Or at least not one that you are really sure is there.

Because there is nothing there, I’ve been able to spend time contemplating what I want. Things with the cute boy are going well, he makes me smile, he tells me he loves me, I even caught him nuzzling Daisy the other night when I went to brush my teeth. But he refuses to say we are doing anything more than hanging out.

I’ve brought it up and he gets quiet… and awkward… and just looks so darn vulnerable and cute I have a really hard time pressing the issue.

And I’ve been telling myself that I don’t need a label. That labeling is what causes expectations and pressure. But the thing is I do.

I am struggling trying to balance what my practice teaches me about life and what I need in a romantic relationship.

I know I am difficult in love; I need space, so much space. I need to do my own thing and rage and cry and laugh and love in a very, very large container. I need to get lost in a book, a class, a conversation, even my own mind and not worry that my partner will feel disconnected. Some people would like their container to be Tupperware, I prefer mine to be like a biosphere. Completely self sufficient... But I still like knowing at the end of the day I have a partner who will support me and hold me up if I ever need it, that there is a hand to hold and a loving smile when things go terribly wrong.

And I know a label does not create this. And so I’ve struggled with it. I have spent time both on the cushion and off contemplating what I want. I wanted to be sure of what I was saying before I said it, to know that I really could follow through.

What I wanted to say was this: I realize I went in to this saying that I didn’t want a commitment, that I’m stubborn and impossible and can tend to lose my head in love and I absolutely do not want to go through that pain again, but I realized no matter what kind of ground rules are laid down, when this ends, it will hurt, even if I pretend we are nothing serious, because we are. And it’s ok if you don’t want this, I can’t be mad if we want two different things, I love you and we will remain friends no matter what. But for my own sake, I can’t continue in limbo.

And of course, though I’ve been planning the conversation for the past two weeks, it came out jumbly and wrong and left the boy confused on what I was asking. And when I clarified, he asked if I was giving him an ultimatum, and as much as I tried to argue that I absolutely was not giving an ultimatum, but merely a choice, I know the truth.

And he asked for time, which was a relief, even if he had responded the way I wanted in that moment, I would have felt like I pressured him in to it.

And I realize I could lose him over this. And I am so torn, am I trying to control, to shape, to write a story? Or am I merely asking for what I want while remaining comfortable if I don't get it? At what point do we stop just letting things unfold and try to bring some sort of definition to the path?

I don’t know, but could sure use some words of wisdom.

9 comments:

  1. Oh, Sweetie! Thanks for sharing. I think I can relate a little.

    When my husband and I were first dating (in our mid 20s), I learned that he never really wanted to get married. Something about not needing a state-sanctioned piece of paper to prove your commitment to someone. For me, getting married was an important way to proclaim my commitment to someone.

    We dated for 5 years - not really ever talking about marriage, but he knew where I stood and I knew where he stood. At 30, I was looking to my future and realizing that if this relationship wasn't going to the next level, it needed to end. (scary!!!!)

    I didn't get a chance to tell him that though, because he proposed! I was so shocked. We've been married for 2 years now.

    There is no moral to this story and I don't actually have any wisdom to give you other than this: Your bio says you are 26. That means you have plenty of time to figure things out :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a happy story! I thought about waiting for the cute boy to come to the conclusion on his own, but then realized I never told him that I wanted a commitment, I just sort of changed my mind and then became irritated he didn’t know! And yes, I have plenty of time. And the re-shaping of parameters and understanding what is a “deal breaker” and what I can live with is an experience I am fascinated with, it’s like I’m constantly learning more about myself. However some days I’d like to go back to a year ago when I was absolutely certain of what I wanted (although it’s nowhere near what I want today!).

    ReplyDelete
  3. hey there - i just want to give you kudos for living with authenticity and integrity. And I can't help but think that whatever happens you have spoken from your heart... and a good partner/ lover/ friend will respect that and love you all the more for speaking from that place. I'm not surprised it feels so wobbly - for me, that's when I know I'm really onto something authentic. I hope he values that in you too!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. it's important to give him the opportunity to say what he wants as well, without a sense that he's being pressured into some kind of perfectly clear and concise answer. maybe he's not clear about it. maybe he's scared. i have no idea really.

    but also give yourself credit for taking a risk. at some point, you had to. it might propel things into a more committed place. and yes, it might be a deal breaker.

    i wish both of you all the best.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you bookbird- being authentic is difficult, I am hoping he will appreciate that I was but being careful not to expect that he will :).

    Nathan, as usual your words are true, I am honoring his request for time, as much as I want to pick up the phone and ask him his thoughts, trying to be patient and trust he will tell me when he's ready.

    Much metta.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am meeting you at a vulnerable time. Thank you for this opportunity to walk right on in.

    I've been married for 22 years. Recently I went through one of those "are we really right for each other" seasons. We are not the same people who got married 22 years ago. We both changed.

    The committment, while nice, doesn't stop those feelings of impermanence. Oh! how I wish it did! Because there are no illusions. Everything can fall apart.

    You are wrestling with the same thing as me. And I've been "committed" for a big long time. I think it never stops being a practice.

    I won't lie. History makes it easier. Having 22 years behind me makes each day feel more sturdy. But I still have days when I wonder, "will he still want me tomorrow, after I've behaved this way today?"

    I think this is good. I'm not sure why. Your post is making me ask this question and, by living the questions I will find the answers.

    What a dear one you are to make me think in this vulnerable way. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Something inside you seeks permanence. "In change there is the resolute." Those are two contradictory "facts." You recognize things change & may not be permanent, but you recognize also a need for permanence in many manifestations. Labels. Categories. Control of the process. Etc. All versus just feeling and enjoying. Go with the big biosphere. There is no control in a big biosphere. There is only freedom. That's my take.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I need labels too. I don't know why, but when I started seeing Scrubs and we were acting like boyfriend and girlfriend without actually BEING boyfriend and girlfriend, I felt suspiciously like I was being cheated, or like he was trying to have his cake and eat it. I don't think labels are as important to guys, but I found it necessary to talk to him the way you talked to your cute boy. It wasn't an ultimatum... but it was. It totally was. I have no interest of being taken advantage of and even though labels aren't important, once you're labelled as a couple you each have as much to lose as the other.

    For example (and this is a flippant example), someone saying 'oh, he was scoring some girl but he's done with that now' plays down what is clearly a relationship no matter how you want to label it) and changes the meaning of a sentence that essentially should be 'he broke up with his girlfriend'.

    Labels just carry a lot more weight, and as such, I think, a lot more value.

    If it walks like a relationship and it talks like a relationship.... Why call it a duck?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rebecca- yes, history can provide support, but you're right in no way does it provide permenance! There really is no way to garauntee it... How I wish there was! Although I suppose this is wonderful practice in letting go of that want to garauntee it!

    Wise GC :) now if only I could do this more... but I do suppose that is why it is called a practice :)

    And yes you dazzling Magpie Harley :) - but it still appears we are going to call it a duck....

    ReplyDelete